Scene anylasis Fifth element Essay Example

Scene anylasis Fifth component Essay The film opens with an injection of what shows up as the watcher flying through a space rock belt, at that point the name of the film is uncovered, slicing to the watcher floating in space with a blue and white planet being noticeable above. The camera skillet and pivots and an outsider spaceship gradually inches itself onto the scene. We as the watcher are promptly mindful that the film that we are going to watch is situated In sci-fi. However, looking nearer, the boat that enters the edge, looks run down, old, practically organic, and Its creation Its way towards what seems, by all accounts, to be earth. A space rock glimmers through the dark night sky background, sparkling with stars, and the camera dish down towards the planet. Split seconds after the fact we find that the planet is, truth be told, earth, and that we are in Egypt in the year 1914. Quickly we have a Juxtaposition of the old and new, the antiquated supernatural component and the modern sci-fi that we were given minutes prior. The scene keeps on indicating a little youngster. Close to 10. Riding in on a jackass towards what gives off an impression of being a type of mountain cavern. This is a case of transmission discourse ND dietetic sound. As the kid approaches they start to comprehend that it is in reality an archeological site being revealed, something like a sanctuary or hallowed place. He is welcomed by other kids yelling out to him. The yelling is in, what I accept that is Egyptian, anyway it doesn't make a difference, the quirks of the kids give us the setting of what's going on, they have all the earmarks of being yelling for the child to give them something, they are walling and you, the watcher, start to comprehend that the child riding the jackass is a type of currier. We will compose a custom paper test on Scene anylasis Fifth component explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom paper test on Scene anylasis Fifth component explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom article test on Scene anylasis Fifth component explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer The child gets off, runs up the inclined Atari of the sanctuary, he is assailed by different kids and they figure out how to take from him something like a gourd, or old conceal skin drinking sack. The child runs into the cavern like sanctuary structure, goes between certain sections of old Egyptian plan, and looks around a corner to discover a man who Is analyzing the divider, with another man sitting In a seat, composing something. The kid utilizes textural discourse by shouting to Aziza who is another child who utilizes an enormous brilliant or metal platter to hold himself up as he gives off an impression of being snoozing, counterbalancing his weight with that of the huge platter. The scene movements to the man contemplating the divider, and he yell to Aziza to create light, the child is surprised wakeful, and we see that the platter Is utilizing the impression of the sun to deliver light on the divider. The man sitting In the seat denotes a different line for what gives off an impression of being a how frequently Aziza get the man analyzing the divider and clarifying what he trusts it implies. We currently observe that he is inspecting images and symbolic representations on the divider, he is telling Billy, whom we presently accept that is his right hand to ensure and draw and record their find. Billy, showing up boarded, excuses the man and keeps on drawing a boat. The scene proceeds with an unfavorable hooded figure drawing nearer behind the child conveying the conceal drinking sack, he snatches him by the shoulder alarming the youngster. The unfavorable hooded man shouts that the child has brought the water, lauds him, and sends him off on his way with divine beings gifts. The child runs out and we start to accept that this inauspicious hooded figure is increasingly likened to a strict minister as opposed to the unfavorable figure we thought of him insignificant seconds back. The scene moves back to the man inspecting the divider, whom we can now securely say s a prehistorian or researcher contemplating old sanctuaries and symbolic representations. The classicist utilizes showy discourse to clarify that the images speak to gatherings of individuals assembling around what seem, by all accounts, to be sections of components, fire, water, wind, and earth, and he goes on the clarify that the individuals and components are additionally accumulated around one peculiarity in the center, the fifth component, the preeminent being. Hearing this we switch back to the cleric in the hood, he pulls out a vial, approaching the master for excuses as they definitely know excessively. At that point the cleric drops the vial on the lour this made scansion sound as it made realized that it broke on the hard stone floor. The inclination moves back to us accepting that this cleric, is truth be told, looking for trouble. In the wake of pouring the fluid from the vial into the conceal drinking sack the hooded cleric ventures out from behind the columns and makes himself noticeable. Again we dont realize what to think as he is welcomed with merriments from both the paleologist and Billy the colleague. The two of them clearly hold the hooded man in high view and consider him to be a strict individual calling him Father. The hooded cleric approaches looking ere anxious, he is welcomed by the energized paleologist who is disclosing to him that they have discovered what could be the most significant find in mankind's history. Out of sight the sign music set a dubious pace for the scene. At that point the dad anxiously pours them beverages of water, looking extremely apprehensive, this persuades, and among his past proclamations that the water has been harmed by whatever was in the vial he had poured in it. The paleontologist keeps on becoming energized guaranteeing that this find will put him on the map, and the cleric recommends they toast to the find. As they are going to drink the harmed water the classicist unexpectedly stops, the strain and apprehensive vitality originating from the minister is so attractive you can nearly taste it now. The prehistorian spills the water out and shouts that water is nothing they can toast to and sends his colleague to get diagram, which gives off an impression of being a type of champagne or white wine. The temperament in the room out of nowhere switches, you can hear the youngsters snickering and yelling outside, the room starts to diminish and rapidly develop dull. The pries ventures towards the camera with a look of both respect, dread, and stunningness shouts that they re here. The following casing reintroduces the massive outsider boat, and we start to comprehend its size and scale, as it overshadows the mountain sanctuary cavern, the thing is huge. Billy the colleague has now seen it and he is groveling in interest and wonder attempting to process the sight he is seeing. The paleologist baffled at the together, sparkle in from the outsider boat into the sanctuary grounds, which light up the room enormously. Satisfied with the light the excavator shouts much better to witch Aziza is confused and stunned by, and we are given an extremely loving scene, that Juxtapositions all that we have seen up until now, supernatural quality, history, science, religion, and obviously, the sci-fi. Seconds after the fact the space ships cove entryways open and a few outsider animals start to land, they are moderate moving, huge, turtle like creatures canvassed in exceptionally dirty and old, antiquated in any event, looking protective layer or space suits. Despite the fact that they appear to be automated we don't know what they are as of now, Billy franticly gets for a pencil and starts portraying what he sees before him. The cleric tumbles to his knees and we presently realize that he holds a love towards these creatures. Apparently the creatures are muttering to one another as they are entering the scene then they approach the prehistorian who despite everything has not seen them, as he pivots lastly observes the creatures, we are treated with another diverting scene, he asks are you German, to which the being before him shakes his head. This scene sets up the sound of the outsiders. One of the creatures starts to talk with the cleric, it shouts that the minister and those before him, probably in his request, have served them well, yet he expresses that the stones are not, at this point safe on earth and that war is coming. We at that point see one more of the outsider creatures approach the divider that the paleontologist was examining, a four pronged key like item projects from the creatures fingertip and he drives it into the divider to witch it opens, in this way this seems, by all accounts, to be a key, a vital aspect for opening mystery entries in the sanctuary. This scene is exceptionally fascinating in light of the fact that we are currently given setting, anyway slight, to who or what these animals are. They clearly have the way in to the sanctuary which implies that they have comprehension and information on its plan. They have either assembled it, or know the development that did, whichever way we comprehend that these creatures hold some antiquated information about humankind and the historical backdrop of our planet, if not our race. The paleontologist is stunned now he gives off an impression of being in a condition of stun, shouting this truly is unfathomable, to which the outsider animals appear to flag one another, one of them moves toward the classicist from behind and its eyes gleam, making the excavator black out and tumble down. This is repudiating in light of the fact that the outsiders expressed that the earth individuals have served them well then a couple of moments later takes out the educator oblivious with he shining eyes. The animals enter through the entryway and stroll into a kind of chamber, the chamber contains four columns encompassing one focal column in a square, the camera focuses in on the focal column and we start to make out its shape, it's anything but a column at everything except rather looking like a man with his mouth open to the sky. The cleric after seeing the man formed sculpture in the focal point of the chamber shouts that it is or speaks to the fifth component, whatever that might be, as we despite everything don't have the foggiest idea. One of the outsiders advises the others to take the stones, so they approach the four columns encompassing the chamber and expel long triangular stones, one from every column, th

AP Style FAQs Part 2 - The Writers For Hire

AP STYLE FAQS: PART 2 A week ago, we commenced a smaller than usual arrangement of Associated Press Stylebook-themed blog entries. This week, we’re sharing a couple of more diamonds of astuteness from The AP Stylebook Online. Q: What’s the standard for promoting a person’s title? An: It’s confounded, yet here are the rudiments: AP characterizes a conventional title as â€Å"one that means an extent of power, proficient movement or scholarly activity.† When utilizing a proper title, you ought to underwrite the title in the event that it shows up legitimately before a person’s name. In this way, you’d compose â€Å"President Barack Obama† or â€Å"Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi.† Be that as it may: At the point when you set the person’s name off with commas, you don’t underwrite a conventional title †regardless of whether the title is before the person’s name. In this way, you may state, â€Å"The hotel’s senior supervisor, John Smith, gave to the cause.† Or â€Å"The VP, Joe Biden, showed up at the event.† When utilizing a title alone (without a person’s name), you don’t underwrite. Along these lines, you’d compose â€Å"the president gave a speech† or â€Å"the congresswoman visited her hometown.† What's more, don’t confound an occupation title or profession with a conventional title. In this way, you wouldn’t underwrite: instructor, government official, editorial manager, professional, space traveler †regardless of where they show up in the sentence. Whew! Befuddled at this point? AP takes note of that, if all else fails about how to underwrite, the best arrangement is to revise the sentence so that the person’s name is set off in commas. Q: Should â€Å"city hall† be promoted? A: Well, now and again: Capitalize â€Å"City Hall† if you’re expounding on a particular city corridor (like Boston City Hall, Houston City Hall, and so forth.). This is additionally the standard in situations where a particular city lobby is inferred; for instance, if you’re composing for a neighborhood Houston pamphlet, you’d compose â€Å"City Hall† (even without â€Å"Houston† †it’s safe to accept that your perusers will comprehend which one you mean). Be that as it may, if you’re expounding on ANY city lobby †for example, â€Å"A city corridor is a sort of . . .† or â€Å"You can’t battle city hall† †leave it lower-cased. Q: When utilizing the abbreviation â€Å"CEO,† do I need to work out â€Å"Chief Executive Officer (CEO)† on first reference? An: I was kind of amazed by this: No. President is so broadly utilized that it’s alright to use all alone. Be that as it may, AP recommends working out all other C-level titles, as â€Å"Chief Financial Officer (CFO)† and â€Å"Chief Operating Officer (COO)† Q: So, in your last blog, you said magazine and paper titles shouldn’t be emphasized, just promoted. Shouldn't something be said about book titles? A: Book titles ought to be promoted and placed in quotes. Likewise for practically all piece titles, including computer games, films, TV shows †and the titles of talks, discourses, and gems. Thus, you’d compose: â€Å"The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Klay† (book); â€Å"Fallout 3† (computer game); â€Å"Inglorious Basterds† (film); â€Å"Annabel Lee† (sonnet); â€Å"Deadwood† (TV appear).

Genre Kryptonite Novels of Female Friendship

Genre Kryptonite Novels of Female Friendship This is a guest post by our current Rioter in Residence, Kevin Smokler. Kevin  is the author of forthcoming essay collection  Practical Classics: 50 Reasons to Reread 50 Books you Haven’t Touched Since High School(Prometheus Books, Feb. 2013) and the editor of  Bookmark Now: Writing in Unreaderly Times, A San Francisco Chronicle Notable Book of 2005. His work has appeared in the LA Times, Fast Company, Paid Content, The San Francisco Chronicle, Publishers Weekly and on National Public Radio. Follow him on  Twitter  @weegee. _________________________ I’ve never thought the purpose of reading fiction was to “relate” to the tale being told or see myself in the characters. I did read Tales of a Fourth Grade Nothing about 65 times as a young boy because, like Peter Hatcher, I too had annoying little brothers. High Fidelity was my jam about a decade ago, right as I developed an interest in collecting vinyl. But really, is that all? Novels can give you a hug, and sometimes we need that. But more often, I’m reading to have my worldview grow, not to be patted on the back. Where this is probably most obvious is in my odd fondness for stories of women and their friendships with each other. I have read Waiting to Exhale around 11 times and was terribly sad and angry that the sequel Getting to Happy fell about 9 leagues short of the original. Sula was my sand bar in the ocean of Toni Morrison’s literary accomplishment. I received each successive volume of the Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants from my dad. I can tell you How To Make an American Quilt and a thing or two about Girls in Trucks. And J. Courtney Sullivan and Curtis Sittenfeld are my homegirls, if you really want to know. The why is both simple and not so. I came from a family of all brothers and bloomed late, so women are newer to me than, say, if I had sisters or went to Vassar for college. I like to read dialogue, and (gasp) novels featuring women friends involve a lot of sitting around and talking. After you go through a few of these novels, you realize reading about women helps a fella both communicate and understand women, which is a lot better than being the very kind of dumbfuck women talk about when they get together and commiserate. That’s the simple reason. The murkier one rests on questions of invitation. I’ve no doubt Terry McMillian wanted Waiting to Exhale to be a story about her and her black female peers. But it’s also a story about loyalty and family, career and growing older, and it manages to cover those bases in addition to being a story about African-American sisterhood, and not because it’s a story of African-American sisterhood. And I think the women writers who do this best (I am sure there are men who have written great female friendship books. One isn’t coming to me at the moment), sweep in the grander themes while wrestling with the particular. They seem aware that their stories have much to say beyond “this is a tale of people like me” and expect more from their readers than “Preach on!” That’s the invitation. I don’t hang out with any reader who has decided they aren’t into a particular literature simply because the characters aren’t exactly like them. I get that they feel uninvited to the party the author is throwing. But to this reader, a great book about female friendships doesn’t slam the gate on other kinds of readers, doesn’t uninvite. Every author I’ve mentioned includes three-dimensional male characters that aren’t simply husbands or mean bosses or sexy paperboys. Why? Because it’s just good writing to do so. Great female friendship writers embed their books with an understanding that, while women are the story here, we all share the world together, and while there may not be a lot of dudes present, the female characters all try to see men as people with a point of view. A different one, yes, but a human one still. I don’t expect other men to charge out and start feasting on novels about menopause and sexism in the military. But they’d be missing something. Because any great book to me is about feeling more human, in good ways and bad, different yet somehow the same. Sign up to Unusual Suspects to receive news and recommendations for mystery/thriller readers. Thank you for signing up! Keep an eye on your inbox.

The 11 Most Poisonous Animals

Conquering Sainte Terre in Walking by Henry David Thoreau ...

In Walking by Henry David Thoreau he starts off â€Å"I wish to speak a word for Nature, for absolute freedom and wildness, as contrasted with a freedom and culture merely civil, — to regard man as an inhabitant, or a part and parcel of Nature, rather than a member of society.† He continues on how walking isn’t just a workout or voyage to see the landscape but a crusade to conquer Sainte Terre the â€Å"Holy Land†, that we â€Å"must walk like camels†. When Thoreau sets out on his crusade he continues about how when walking he tries to avoid the main roads, any villages and any populated areas to avoid society because the word village derives from the Latin words for road and for vile. He believed that if you have paid your debts, settled all your†¦show more content†¦Robert Matuozzi article focuses on The American Scholar by Ralph Waldo Emerson. He quotes Emerson â€Å"Men have become the tool of their tools†. I think he uses this q uote because he too believes that how when a person specializes with a tool, the person themselves then becomes the tool to the society and the people in it. From reading this \article I learned that Emerson believed that knowledge wasn’t gained from institutions but from real world experience. I agree with this article because Emerson wanted life to be simpler than it was. He didn’t expect everyone to understand him but he wanted people to learn his type of thinking and how it changed him. In this article Tom Potter criticizes Thoughts About Walden by Henry David Thoreau. After reading the book again he believes that it may be challenging for people to define Walden because it can be interrupted as Transcendental Philosophy, or nature. He believes that Thoreau offers no real answer to life’s haunting questions. People expect there to be only one answer but Thoreau says that there is otherwise. He believed that people who may read this might consider living a simpler life. â€Å"Thoreau himself gives no direct answer to anything. He stimulates and walks away, leaving you to continue the great exploration of life†. (Potter) In the article I read by Tom Potter that is about the Thoughts About Walden he describes the book to have many meanings than just the

The Ideal Late 1700 Woman Free Essays

The Ideal late 1700 Woman Susanna Rowson and Judith Sargent Murray were women from the late 1700s who had their own image of the ideal woman. Susanna Rowson’s Charlotte: A Tale of Truth and Judith Sargent Murray’s On the Equality of the Sexes were written to educate, inform, and to guide women in the right path. Murray and Rowson hoped to change the way women were being seduced by men and the way they were viewed by society and themselves, Susanna Rowson and Judith Sargent Murray saw women’s roles in the early United States similar. We will write a custom essay sample on The Ideal Late 1700 Woman or any similar topic only for you Order Now In the 1700s women had a basic education of reading and writing and most were trained to become mothers and house wives. Women’s job was to take care of the children at home, cook, clean, and do housework; they were kept from the world. They had no say in politics, government, or legal issues unless their husband allowed them to do so behind the scenes. Susanna Rowson’s motive in writing Charlotte was pure, she wrote â€Å"If the following tale should save one hapless fair one from the errors which ruined poor Charlotte, or rescue from impending misery the heart of one anxious parent, I shall feel a much higher gratification in reflecting on this trifling performance, than could possibly result from the applause which might attend he most elegant finished piece of literature whose tendency might deprave the heart or mislead the understanding. † Rowson wrote Charlotte to try to change the way young women were educated. I believe she wanted parents to teach their daughters that they should listen and pay attention to the advice her parents give her, but also to teach them of the consequences can come if they decide to go in their own path instead of what her parents had planned for her. Susanna Rowson apologized for her novel because everyone expected a happy ending but received the opposite. When Charlotte’s father was on his way for her from England, she passed away after she gave birth to her illegitimate daughter Lucy Temple. Many questioned, why did Charlotte have to die? Rowson wrote, â€Å"The mind of the youth eagerly catches at promised pleasure and innocent by nature, it thinks not of the dangers lurking beneath those pleasures, till too late to avoid them. † I believe the reason Rowson did this was to try to teach young women that there are pros and cons in every decision they make. Rowson’s intentions were to guide young women live the ideal life she believed was meant for a women in the late 1700s. Mademoiselle La Rue’s life was one she approved of; she â€Å"had eloped from a onvent with a young officer, and, on coming to England, had lived with several different men in open defiance of all moral and religious duties†. Even though La Rue had been with several men she was strong and never allowed men to stray away from her path. Mademoiselle had never been seduced by a man. Susanna Rowson’s believed in order for a young women to grow up and have the ideal life, she should not only listen to her parents but also do as they say. Women in the 1700s were only given a basic education and trained to be housewives. Judith Sargent Murray’s On the Equality of the Sexes was written to give women the education they deserved and needed. Murray felt that women were capable of doing more than housework; she believed they could do the same as men if not to be better than them. To prove that women and men were equal and should be getting the same education she questions, â€Å"May not the intellectual powers be ranged under these four heads- imagination, reason, memory, and judgment? † As the Enlighten women she gave evidence to everything she said or wrote. She proved that men and women had the same capability to imagine. She wrote â€Å"but as proofs of a creative faculty, of a lively imagination†, Murray’s evidence that women had an imagination was gossiping. If women didn’t have an imagination how would they be able to come up with such interesting rumors and gossip? Murray goes on to say, â€Å"Are we deficient in reason? We can only reason from what we know, and if an opportunity of acquiring knowledge hath been denied us, the inferiority of our sex cannot fairly be deduced from thence. † She is saying if they teach women physics, psychology, and other subjects besides the basics they can prove they have the same power of reasoning as men. She then proves that women also have the power of memory, because women memorize stories and share them with others. Murray wrote, â€Å"Female would become discreet, their judgment would be invigorated, and their partners for life being circumspectly chosen, an unhappy Hymen would then be as rare as is now the reverse. † She believed if women had the same education as men, women would be not only smart but also better wives. Murray believed that everyone was born equal but society taught them that they were different. To prove that equality is given by nature she questions, â€Å"Will it be said that the judgment of a male of two year old is more sage than that of a female’s of the same age? † She compared two year olds to prove that they are equal until they get to school. Once in school society doesn’t allow women to have the same opportunity to learn. They are automatically put in different schools where they are taught different material. She goes on to say â€Å"How is the one exalted and the other depressed by the contrary modes of education which are adopted! The one is taught to aspire and the other is early confined and limited. Women are limited and that is why they do not have the same knowledge as men do. She believed women should not only get educated on not being seduced by men but also felt that they should have the same education as men. Murray believed women should have the same opportunity as men in society. Women should be able to independently provide for themselves, but due to lack of education they were not allowed to do so. Murray brings religion into her essay when she writes, â€Å"our souls by nature equal to yours; the same breath of God animates, enlivens, and invigorates us†. She proves that men are no different from women when they came into this world. God took the same breath into both men and women so what makes men better? Susanna Rowson and Judith Sargent Murray both intended to reach, like Rowson wrote, the â€Å"young and thoughtless of the fair sex†. When she wrote Charlotte: A Tale of Truth, she wanted to protect vulnerable young women from doing the wrong thing. She wrote, â€Å"Oh my dear girls—for to such only am I writing—listen not to the voice of love, unless sanctioned by paternal approbation: be assured, it is now past the days of romance. Rowson felt that women should know some of the basics to protect themself from rakes, and wanted to teach them to marry the right man. She felt as if young women were easily seduced by men. She warns the reader by writing â€Å"In affairs of love, a young heart is never in more danger than when attempted by a handsome young soldier. † For example, Charlotte decided to rebel against her parents and became romantically involved with Montraville, a man her parents disapproved of. Charlotte was a young naive 15 year old girl that got seduced by an attractive man that promised â€Å"the world† to her. He promised to marry her but instead, took her to New York, and then he abandoned her and their unborn child. Charlotte’s fate went bad when she decided to follow her heart instead of her parents. She was seduced and betrayed by the man she fell deeply in love with, this is what Rowson was trying to prevent in the lives of her young readers. In Part II of Judith Sargent Murray’s essay she wrote, â€Å"Praise is sweet to the soul; we are immediately intoxicated by large draughts of flattery, which being plentifully administered, is to the pride of our hearts the most acceptable incenses. In Murray’s essay she writes that women were seduced by men with their intellectuals. She felt that women should be educated on how not to be tempted when a man tried to seduce her. Rowson and Murray both believed that women should be educated on how to avoid falling into temptation and how to save their reputation. In the late 1700’s women were seen as the temptress and p unished for seducing men. But why is it okay that men are allowed to tempt women and get away with it? In Charlotte, Rowson tries to inform everyone that men are the temptress, not women. Charlotte falls for Montraville’s lies and betrayal because she had sympathy for him. Rowson stopped her story to put her input about women being too compassionate, â€Å"when once she has lost sight of the basis on which reputation, honor, everything that should be dear to the female heart, rest, she grows hardened in guilt, will spare no pains to bring ceeds from that diabolical spirit of envy†. Men know that once women start feeling sympathy for someone they drop the wall that they was there to protect them from becoming the fallen woman, Rowson and Murray wanted this to change. Judith Sargent Murray and Susanna Rowson were smart women that wanted young women to be educated. They differed on their opinions on how much education a woman should have. Murray believed that women should have the same education as men, and Rowson believed there was a limit on the amount of education a woman should receive. Both believed that young women should be educated to the extent where they did not fall into temptation and be marked as a temptress. In their stories they gave proof of what they believed should be done and why. How to cite The Ideal Late 1700 Woman, Papers

Spring Break 6 by Luke Bryan free essay sample

We all like certain kinds of music but we aren’t born with our tastes and other characteristics. I am a pianist and I liken to think a good one. Depending on the time or mood, I mostly like country and rap music. Many people think of country music as the kind of music that â€Å"hicks† from the south listen to, but that just simply isn’t true. Country music has so many different flavors, they are just sometimes hard to detect. To the untrained ears, many say that all country music sounds the same and just tells the same stories over and over again. Although there is a little bit about southern hillbillies, there is quite a bit of music that will; fit your modern and contemporary needs. The famed Luke Bryan has a new album fit perfectly for the time of year. His â€Å"Spring Break 6† album has many elements that might surprise quite a few folks. We will write a custom essay sample on Spring Break 6 by Luke Bryan or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Most of the six songs throw in a flare of electronic music and each makes you forget about school or work and think about what your spring break might be like. The songs are as follows, â€Å"She Get Me High†, â€Å" Like We Ain’t Ever†, Night One†, â€Å"Are You Leaving With Him†, â€Å"Good Lookin’ Girl†, and â€Å"The Sand I Brought To The Beach†. Now I’m sure that to many country skepticists, these all sound like common country topics, but, to any Luke Bryan fan or someone looking for something fresh with a little bit of twist, I highly recommend Luke Bryan’s latest album, Spring Break 6.